|
W.E league tables are impacted by the number 1 economics challenge of the next 7 years - integrating every locality and culture into globalisation by identifying 30000+replicable community-rising projects  . | . | . | Our league table of most trusted world entrepreneurs
(W.E) is based on the valuation of entrepreneurial systems that my father mapped over 40 years of work at The Economist
(1950-1989). During the mass media media (1, 2 3) age, Norman found more and more macroeconomic models to be "disgraceful political chicanery" devoid of deep
context which is where innovation mines. In his 1984 future history of the global generation he warned this biggest system change ever to hit our planet -and one generation of our species
- can lead only lead to one of 2 opposite outcomes spinning: goodwill: sustaining a 21st Century that ends poverty and is the most productive
era for all on the planet, or badwill:
a globe of increasing conflicts and crashes (1 2 3. 4.) ultimately supporting less and less people, if indeed our species survives. Not all of the original meanings of entrepreneurship
are popular today. See companion blog to Q&A conceptual origins such as: - world entrepreneurs advance the human lot,
- human breakthroughs
often emerge from half a lifetime of wirk, experienting small, only spending large when a proven benefits if worth scaling
- typically great breakthroughs involve small teams (starung with te roles of 3 people) -although
one person often takes the fame, its the human realtionship molecule and its ability to interface locally to globally that
needs benchmarking, not so mush individual personal habits
- W.E. develop
purposeful organisations whose upward exponentials also multiply upward flow curves of employees -and peer networks - whose
lifetime make a difference
- their defintion of free market is that solutions
to life-critical needs are innovated and delivered for everyone in need
- typically
they dislike patents and other blocks to multiplying knowledge advances - Jon non Neumann is a hero of ours
for saying that in a networked age, knowledge patents would normally not need to be of more than 3 months duraction becasue
during that time the epicenhtre of the new knowledge would be so far networked ahead of others that tere would be little danger
of losing the lead whilst still passioantely wanting to work in that domain
 
|
|
